Most CNS study teams don’t discover platform gaps at the start of their study. They discover them six months in — when query rates are climbing, a protocol amendment is stuck in a vendor queue, or a site coordinator is manually tracking LAR consent status in a spreadsheet. This checklist is a practical diagnostic for both scenarios: use it before your study launches to evaluate whether your platform is built for CNS complexity, or use it mid-study to identify where the cracks are before they become a crisis.
What’s Inside:
Perfect for:
Download the checklist and work through it with your study team — any unchecked box is a conversation worth having before it becomes urgent.